This covers injuries arising from negligence in a wide range of contexts — a hazard on someone else's property, an accident caused by a defective condition, or another party's carelessness that resulted in harm, distinct from the specific traffic accident or medical malpractice categories. Road-accident injuries follow the Najm-documented route under traffic accidents & compensation, and workplace injuries the route under work & occupational injury.
Establishing the claim requires showing the other party's negligence, the resulting injury, and a clear causal link between them, supported by medical records and any other available evidence.
Compensation generally accounts for medical costs, lost income, and the severity and lasting impact of the injury, assessed under both material damages (measurable financial loss) and moral damages (non-financial harm) principles. Fixed-schedule bodily compensation — diyah and arsh — is assessed alongside under diyah & blood money.
This practice handles the full claim process, from initial documentation through negotiation or litigation to secure fair compensation.
A common misconception is that being involved in an accident on someone else's property somehow shares the blame with the property owner by default, when the actual legal question is narrower and more specific: did the property owner fail in a genuine duty to maintain safe conditions or warn of a known hazard, and did that specific failure cause the injury — a question entirely separate from whether the injured person was doing anything unusual at the time.
We help potential claimants understand this distinction clearly before assuming their own presence at the scene somehow weakens a claim that may actually be quite strong once the property owner's specific duty and failure are properly examined against what actually happened.
A successful negligence claim generally requires establishing several distinct elements — that the other party owed a duty of care, that they breached that duty, and that the breach actually caused the injury — and an injury alone, however genuine and serious, doesn't automatically establish all of these elements without the specific facts actually supporting each one individually.
We build claims around clearly establishing each of these elements with the available evidence, since a claim that focuses only on the severity of the injury without properly addressing duty, breach, and causation individually is often weaker than one that methodically establishes the full chain of legal responsibility.
A wide range — a hazard on someone else's property, an injury caused by a defective condition, or other negligence-based harm that doesn't fall under the traffic accident or GOSI workplace injury categories.
Medical records, documentation of the specific hazard or negligent condition, witness accounts, and photos or other evidence from close to the time of the incident.
Yes — it can include lost income and moral damages for the non-financial impact of the injury, alongside medical costs. We can assess what applies to your specific situation.
Not automatically — the actual question is whether the property owner failed in a specific duty of care, which is entirely separate from whether you were doing anything unusual at the time.
Generally three elements: that the other party owed a duty of care, that they breached it, and that the breach caused your injury — we build claims around establishing each of these specifically.
Not on its own — the severity of an injury doesn't automatically establish the other party's negligence, which is why we focus on proving duty, breach, and causation individually rather than relying on the injury's severity alone.
Expert Riyadh