From traffic accidents to medical malpractice and the diyah/arsh framework.
This practice represents the person who was harmed, pursuing the compensation they're owed, which is the mirror image of the firm's Criminal & Penal defense work — where that practice defends someone accused of causing harm, this one represents the person who suffered it.
The work spans traffic accidents, general personal injury, medical malpractice, and the diyah (blood money) and arsh (bodily harm compensation) framework that applies alongside or instead of criminal proceedings in many cases.
Traffic accident claims are among the most common this practice handles, and the Najm insurance assessment report plays a central role in establishing fault — reviewing it carefully before accepting an insurer's settlement offer often reveals room to negotiate a stronger outcome.
Beyond the road, general personal injury claims cover harm from a workplace accident, a defective product, or another party's negligence more broadly, following the same core principle: establishing fault, harm, and the link between them.
The diyah and arsh framework gives victims and families a path to financial compensation for death or bodily harm that operates independently of, and generally doesn't require waiting for, any criminal case against the responsible party to conclude.
This work is handled with particular sensitivity, recognizing that families pursuing diyah are often navigating this process while also processing a significant loss.
Material and moral damages claims require distinct evidence — documented financial losses for the material component, and a clear account of non-financial harm like pain and suffering for the moral component — and claimants who focus only on the more easily quantified material losses often underclaim what they're genuinely owed.
For medical malpractice specifically, a poor outcome alone doesn't establish a claim — proving the care fell below an acceptable standard generally requires independent expert medical evidence, a distinctly higher evidentiary bar than most other compensation matters.
Saudi compensation claims generally require establishing negligence or fault, the resulting harm, and a clear link between the two, and evidence is easier to gather and preserve the sooner a claim is pursued after the incident.
This practice handles the full process — documenting the harm, calculating what's owed under material and moral damages principles, and pursuing payment through negotiation or the courts.
Reach out as soon as possible after any incident, ideally before accepting a settlement offer or signing anything from an insurer or the other party — an early conversation costs nothing and preserves evidence and options that tend to narrow considerably as time passes.
Message us on WhatsApp and describe what happened, and we'll give you an honest assessment of your claim and what it's realistically worth.
No — this practice represents people seeking compensation for harm done to them, while Criminal & Penal defends people accused of causing harm. They're mirror images of each other, and we coordinate between them where a matter involves both a criminal charge and a compensation claim.
As soon as possible — evidence is easier to gather and preserve close to the incident, which meaningfully strengthens a claim.
No — it covers a broader range of personal injury and compensation matters, including medical malpractice and the diyah/arsh framework for death or bodily harm.
We'd recommend having it reviewed first — initial offers sometimes fall short of what a claim is genuinely worth, and once accepted, a shortfall becomes considerably harder to recover.
Generally no — pursuing diyah or arsh is typically an independent right that doesn't require waiting for criminal proceedings to conclude.
Expert Riyadh